skip navigation

CrimeSolutions.gov

Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

LIBRARY

Abstract Database

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

To download this abstract, check the box next to the NCJ number then click the "Back To Search Results" link. Then, click the "Download" button on the Search Results page. Also see the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 98903 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Plea Bargaining - Critical Issues and Common Practices
Author(s): W F McDonald
Corporate Author: Georgetown University
Institute of Criminal Law and Procedure
United States of America
Date Published: 1985
Page Count: 178
Sponsoring Agency: Georgetown University
Washington, DC 20001
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Contract Number: 1-0260-J-OJARS
Sale Source: Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This analysis of critical issues in plea bargaining is based on 1976 data obtained from Delaware County, Pa.; Norfolk, Va.; Tucson, Ariz.; Seattle, Wash.; New Orleans, La.; and El Paso County, Tex.
Abstract: Data were obtained from structured observations of 711 in-court acceptances of guilty pleas; structured interviews with over 200 judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, defendants, and police officers; a plea bargaining decision simulation and quasi-experiment administered to 138 prosecutors and 105 defense attorneys; and a statistical analysis of case file data from 3,397 robbery and burglary cases. The study concludes that the reforms of the guilty plea acceptance procedures of the last decade and a half have made plea decisions more intelligent and ensured defendants the deals they were promised. Still, the researchers found that expanded plea bargaining procedures, including judicial review to ensure the fairness of the plea bargaining process, have left the coercive (induced) character of plea bargaining intact. Virtually all defendants are reported to plead guilty to obtain the offered inducements. Regarding judicial review of plea negotiations, the report indicates that judges do not examine the strength of the State's case, and defendants respond to the judge's inquiries according to the instructions of their attorneys so as to benefit from the prosecutor's promised bargain. Findings indicate that plea bargains submitted to judicial inquiries are rarely rejected. Appendixes contain a list of 1976 cases eligible for diversion in Delaware County and the texts of criminal procedures for the six jurisdictions. Approximately 130 references are listed.
Index Term(s): Arizona; Coercive persuasion of offenders; Louisiana; Pennsylvania; Plea negotiations; Structured plea negotiations; Systems analysis; Texas; Virginia; Washington
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=98903

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.