skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 109497 Find in a Library
Title: Criminal Law -- Probable Cause: Illinois Adopts the Plain Smell Rule for Warrantless Searches of Vehicles. People v. Stout, 106 Ill. 2d 77, 477 N.E. 2d 498 (1985)
Journal: Southern Illinois Law Journal  Volume:11  Dated:(Fall 1986)  Pages:153-169
Author(s): M G Getty
Date Published: 1986
Page Count: 17
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The decision of the Illinois Supreme Court to adopt the 'plain smell rule' in permitting a warrantless search of a vehicle was unfortunate.
Abstract: The court reached the decision in People v. Stout in 1985, overruling an appellate court. The supreme court held that the uncorroborated detection of the cannabis odor by a trained and experienced police officer provided probable cause for that officer to conduct a warrantless search of Robert Stout's vehicle. The decision provides an opening for abuse of the fourth amendment by allowing general searches based solely on a subjective finding of probable cause. In addition, the subjective standard reduces a credibility determination of an officer at a suppression hearing to a finding of whether the officer had sufficient training and experience to be deemed qualified to recognize the odor of cannabis. Cross-examination about the specific circumstances surrounding a warrantless search will thus not be possible. Moreover, the court's lack of guidelines regarding the sufficiency of training and experience required of an officer before conducting a plain smell search leaves lower courts without a standard by which to judge credibility. Finally, the decision clearly points out the need for restriction of the 'serendipity' doctrine. Courts should be allowed to use their discretion and restrict this doctrine in plain smell cases. 144 footnotes. (Author summary modified)
Main Term(s): Warrantless search
Index Term(s): Illinois; Judicial discretion; Marijuana; Plain smell rule; Probable cause; Vehicle searches
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.