skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 113024 Find in a Library
Title: Brief History of House Arrest and Electronic Monitoring
Journal: Northern Kentucky Law Review  Volume:13  Issue:3  Dated:(1987)  Pages:343-374
Author(s): J R Lilly; R A Ball
Date Published: 1987
Page Count: 32
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: House arrest represents the fourth phase in the evolution of punitive sanctions, following upon historical emphases on penance, corporal punishment, and incarceration.
Abstract: To some extent, it also represents a reaction against incarceration and its associated problems of cost, inmate idleness, and overcrowding. Although house arrest dates back to at least the time of St. Paul the Apostle, its widespread use, first with juvenile and then with adult offenders, dates to the 1970's. The surge of interest in house arrest has been closely associated with advances in electronic surveillance and monitoring technologies. The Federal Government and several States have implemented home arrest programs that include supervision, electronic monitoring, and, in many cases, work and community service. Two developments, however, raise concerns about the future of the house arrest movement. Under the Reagan administration, the political climate regarding victimless crimes, such as consensual sexual activity and drug use, has become more intrusive and conservative. In addition, the proliferation of electronic technologies raises the specter of an Orwellian future. These developments increasingly raise concerns over increasing Government control and invasion of privacy. As a policy, home arrest is yet insufficiently developed to allow conclusions as to whether it represents a continuation of correctional policy into more progressive and civilized practices or a pattern of good ideas going wrong and leading to unforeseen and undesirable consequences. 109 footnotes.
Main Term(s): House arrest
Index Term(s): Electronic surveillance; History of corrections; Right of privacy
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.