skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 113240 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Toward Better Management of Criminal Litigation
Journal: Judicature  Volume:72  Issue:1  Dated:(June-July 1988)  Pages:29-37
Author(s): B Mahoney; D A Sipes
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: Bureau of Justice Assistance
Washington, DC 20531
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 84-SN-CX-0001; 84-IJ-CX-0077; 85-IJ-CX-0044
Dataset: DATASET 1  DATASET 2
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After summarizing the findings from two studies of variation across courts in felony case processing time, this article suggests practices and techniques for streamlining the pretrial and trial processes, based on the experiences of efficiently operating courts.
Abstract: One study collected data on case processing times and a number of structural and procedural variables in 18 urban trial courts. Wide variation in the pace of litigation across courts was due to variations in jurisdiction size, workload, caseload composition, trial rates, charging systems, and calendaring systems. A study by the National Center for State Courts collected data on case processing time and segments of the trial process for 625 felony cases tried in 1986 in 9 courts of general jurisdiction in New Jersey, Colorado, and California. Wide variations in case processing time were due to caseload composition and complexity, jury selection, judge's trial management practices, and attorney competence. Both studies indicate that sound management can make a difference in case processing speed and in participants' perceptions of fairness. Some proven techniques for reducing processing time without sacrificing fairness are early screening and charge decisionmaking, early appointment of defense counsel, early discovery, short scheduling, early resolution of motions, firm trial dates, judicial involvement in jury selection, continuous trials, and trial time management. 5 tables, 18 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Court case flow management
Index Term(s): Court delays; Felony courts
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=113240

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.