skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 113641 Find in a Library
Title: Death by Jury (From Challenging Capital Punishment: Legal and Social Science Approaches, P 149-176, 1988, Kenneth C Haas and James A Inciardi, eds. -- See NCJ 113635)
Author(s): V P Hans
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 28
Sponsoring Agency: Sage Publications, Inc
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
Sale Source: Sage Publications, Inc
2455 Teller Road
Thousand Oaks, CA 91320
United States of America
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Using research findings and legal cases on jury decisionmaking in the penalty phase of capital trials, this paper develops a portrait of the penalty-phase jury, including who the jurors are, their views, and their reactions to courtroom proceedings, evidence, and instructions.
Abstract: In the penalty phase of capital trials, jurors are charged with representing the community's judgment, yet the voir dire and challenge processes have eliminated significant segments of the public from the jury. Jurors have been influenced during voir dire questioning and the trial in pivotal ways, yet they are instructed to focus only on aggravating and mitigating evidence. Whether the penalty-phase jury is capable of responsibly fulfilling its task remains unanswered. Despite considerable legal scholarship, there are gaps in knowledge about how the jury confronts the capital decision. Issues requiring further analysis include the interaction between the guilt and penalty phases, juror decisionmaking, the effectiveness of judicial instructions to the jury, and the effect of specific aggravating and mitigating circumstances. 7 notes, 50 references.
Main Term(s): Capital punishment
Index Term(s): Jury decisionmaking; Jury selection; Sentencing/Sanctions; Voir dire
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=113641

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.