skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 114478 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Disaggregating Self-Reported Delinquency and Its Implications for Theory
Journal: Criminology  Volume:26  Issue:4  Dated:(November 1988)  Pages:591-625
Author(s): R Paternoster; R Triplett
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 35
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 81-IJ-CX-0023; 83-IJ-CX-0045
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This paper examines the theoretical import of disaggregating self-reported delinquency data into two constituent parts: prevalence data, which record the proportion of any group involved in crime and reflect the decision to participate in crime; and incidence data, which record the frequency of offending within the subgroups of participants and reflect the decision to repeat a previously committed offense.
Abstract: The importance of this conceptual distinction is that different causal facts may be involved in these separate offending decisions and such differences would be obscured if the data were not disaggregated. Major delinquency theories (social learning, social control, strain, and deterrence theories) were examined to determine if theoretical variables are more strongly related to the prevalence or incidence of delinquency using 1982 and 1983 self-report data for 1,544 high school students. Results suggest the propriety of estimating offense-specific models in testing theories of delinquency and disaggregating commonly used measures of self-reported offending into prevalence and incidence components. While there were not striking differences between factors causally related to prevalence and incidence, there were more subtle differences that would have been obscured had a more traditional measure been used. The strength and consistency of support for differential association theory was also highlighted by results. 1 table and 70 references. (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Self-report studies
Index Term(s): Crime causes theory
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=114478

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.