Add your conference to our Justice Events calendar

PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

1 record(s) found

NCJ Number:	114525

Title:	Use of Non-Custodial Alternatives to Imprisonment: The Point of View of the Court (From Alternatives to Custodial Sanctions, P 194-227, 1988 -- See NCJ-114520)

Author(s):	C Eliaerts

Date Published:	1988

Annotation:	Court sentencing practices in Belgium and other countries are influenced by a variety of factors, including the attitudes of court personnel, the availability of alternatives, the use of out-of-court processes, the perceived effectiveness of alternatives, the crime rate relative to prison capacity, the legal framework, and the interactions among the various components of the criminal justice system.

Abstract:	Factors often considered in sentencing in individual cases include the gravity of the offense, prior criminal record, the nature of the offense, offender characteristics, and the impact of the offense on the victim. In the absence of specific sentencing guidelines, judges have considerable discretion in the imposition of noncustodial sentences. Sentencing decisions will be influenced by judges training and specialization and attitudes on penal matters and punishment. In general, judges who are oriented toward resocialization or reintegration of offenders will be more favorable toward the imposition of noncustodial sentences. In the present repressive penal climate, an overall reductionist strategy must be pursued to encourage the use of alternatives to incarceration. Such a strategy would require abolishing imprisonment for certain offenses, imposing legal minimum terms of imprisonment, introducing sentencing guidelines, improving judicial training, and involving judges in the execution of sentences. An infrastructure to support alternatives and a policy shift toward prevention also are needed.

Main Term(s):	Alternatives to institutionalization

Index Term(s):	Belgium; Judicial discretion; Sentencing factors; Sentencing guidelines

Sponsoring Agency:	Government Printing Ctre SF-00101 Helsinki 10, Finland

Sale Source:	Government Printing Ctre Marketing Department Mail-Order Business P.O. Box 516 SF-00101 Helsinki 10, Finland

Page Count:	34

Type:	Legislation/Policy Analysis

Language:	English

Country:	Finland

Note:	*This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.



	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=114525

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

Find in a Library