skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 114626 Find in a Library
Title: Jury Nullification: The Impact of Judicial Instructions, Arguments, and Challenges on Jury Decision Making
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:12  Issue:4  Dated:(December 1988)  Pages:439-453
Author(s): I A Horowitz
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 15
Sponsoring Agency: University of Toledo
Toledo, OH 43606
Type: Report (Study/Research)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This study was conducted to determine the effects of nullification information to the jury (from judge's instructions and lawyers' arguments) on juries' verdicts and decisionmaking in three criminal cases. Additionally, the research tested the impact of challenges to nullification information on trial outcomes.
Abstract: The doctrine of jury nullification permits juries to acquit defendants despite evidence and judicial instructions to the contrary. Results from this study, obtained from 144 six-person juries, indicate that when juries receive nullification information from the judge or defense attorney, they are more likely to acquit a defendant who elicits sympathy from the jury and to judge a dangerous defendant more harshly than when such information is not given or when challenges are made to nullification arguments. Analysis of the juries' decisionmaking processes suggests that nullification information may alter the way in which juries perceive and use the trial evidence. In those trials in which a nullification defense was successful, juries used the outcome of the case, as well as the intent of the defendant, to assess the worth and weight of the evidence. Pronullification conditions devalued the currency of the evidence and permitted juries to use nonevidentiary factors in deciding the cases used in this study. 4 tables, 4 figures, 21 references. (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Jury nullification instructions
Index Term(s): Closing arguments; Jury decisionmaking
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=114626

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.