Stay Informed Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.
NCJRS Abstract
The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library . See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.
NCJ Number: 114905
Title: Insuring the Accuracy of the Presentence Investigation Report in the Wisconsin Correctional System
Journal: Wisconsin Law Review Volume:1986 Issue:3 Dated:(1986) Pages:613-631
Author(s): J H Bergman
Date Published: 1986
Page Count: 19
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The presentence investigation report (PSI) is the single most important document that influences correctional decisionmaking in Wisconsin.
Abstract: The PSI provides the court with information on the defendant's social, family, and economic background; criminal record; and facts of the crime of conviction. In Wisconsin, the court has discretion to order the preparation of the PSI, usually by an agent who is to serve as the defendant's parole or probation officer. The only statutory requirement regarding the contents of the PSI, is that the preparer attempt to contact the victim of the crime and report on the impact of the crime. The Department of Health and Human Services administrative code contains more detailed requirements; and the report usually includes sentencing recommendations and a tentative treatment plan. The PSI not only influences sentencing, but also is used extensively in correctional decisionmaking in such areas as security classification and actual time spent in custody. The PSI is a valuable correctional tool if accurate, but if inaccurate or misleading, it may have a detrimental effect on the inmate. While Wisconsin law provides that the defense attorney or the unrepresented inmate may have access to the PSI before sentencing, inmates are denied postsentencing access except by specific court authorization. It is suggested that legislative reform is needed to ensure the accuracy of the PSI. Inmates should be given access to the PSI before sentencing and be allowed to retain it thereafter. There should be judicial factfinding should the defendant allege inaccuracies, and alleged inaccuracies should be appended to the institutional record after sentencing. 116 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Presentence investigations
Index Term(s): Corrections decisionmaking; Discretionary decisions; Rights of the accused; Sentencing recommendations; Wisconsin
To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=114905
*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback .
. A title search of 