Home / Publications / NCJRS Abstract

PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

NCJ Number:	115658

Title:	Experience With Pretrial Release in Milwaukee County

Journal:	Research in Corrections Volume:1 Issue:3 Dated:(October 1988) Pages:41-51

Author(s):	C Worzella; B J Sayner

Date Published:	1988

Page Count:	11

Sponsoring Agency:	National Institute of Justice/ Rockville, MD 20849 NCJRS Photocopy Services Rockville, MD 20849-6000

Sale Source:	National Institute of Justice/ NCJRS paper reproduction Box 6000, Dept F Rockville, MD 20849 United States of America NCJRS Photocopy Services Box 6000 Rockville, MD 20849-6000 United States of America

Document:	PDF

Type:	Issue Overview

Language:	English

Country:	United States of America

Annotation:	In response to Stevens H. Clarke's (1988) monograph on pretrial release (PTR), this article discusses opportunities for PTR, controlling risk, and the effectiveness of PTR agencies, with focus on policies and practice in Milwaukee.

Abstract:	In Milwaukee, judges generally support a comprehensive use of bail bond, but bond is rarely set with the defendant's ability to pay in mind. Thresholds exist in terms of charge severity and criminal record, but these vary with judge and actual charge severity. The use of community ties to measure risk of nonappearance is given varying amounts of weight by judges, although research in Milwaukee indicates that ties are not significantly related to failure to appear. The majority of releasees make it through the pretrial period without difficulty, and only a small proportion of those who fail to appear in court remain fugitives. In general, failure to appear is the result of a general pattern of irresponsible behavior, a symptom of a disorganized lifestyle and an inability to plan, frustration with the process, or system errors (e.g., inaccurate calendaring or notification error). PTR agencies interested in improving their effectiveness should measure themselves against other agencies over time. Programs should take into account both benefits and costs (PTR opportunities and risks) when applying new strategies. Finally, an incremental approach to bail reform is recommended. Reactions to specific reforms proposed by Clarke are included.

Main Term(s):	Pretrial release

Index Term(s):	Bail reform; Wisconsin



	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=115658

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

Find in a Library