skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 118328 Find in a Library
Title: Kitchener Experiment (From Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders and Community, P 14-26, 1989, Martin Wright and Burt Galaway, eds. -- See NCJ-118327)
Author(s): D E Peachey
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: Sage Publications Ltd
London, EC2A 4PU, England
Sale Source: Sage Publications Ltd
6 Bonhill Street
London, EC2A 4PU,
United Kingdom
Type: Program/Project Description
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: This chapter traces the evolution of the Victim/Offender Reconciliation Program (VORP) in Kitchener, Ontario, which is often recognized as the forerunner of programs that bring convicted offenders into face-to-face meetings with their victims to explore interpersonal reconciliation and develop a reparation plan.
Abstract: The basic concept for VORP came from probation officer Mark Yantzi. The program centered on restitution and victim-offender reconciliation when it was founded in 1974. It became an option for a probation condition. Offenders could either develop a restitution plan in negotiation with the victim or have the court set the restitution amount. Most offenders chose to negotiate with the victim. Yantzi interviewed each offender referred by the judge to explain the reconciliation process. After the offender agreed to participate in the project, a volunteer visited the victim to explain VORP. Approximately 80 percent of the victims agreed to participate in victim/offender meetings, which were typically held in the home or business where the crime occurred. The project dealt primarily with breaking and entering, theft, vandalism, and other property offenses. VORP became widely known as a probation innovation, and many jurisdictions adopted it although it was never subjected to formal evaluation. The VORP caseload declined to a negligible level by 1985, as there has been a shift in services to probation's monitoring of restitution orders and the preparation of victim impact statements in presentence submissions. 7 notes, 9 references.
Main Term(s): Victim-offender reconciliation
Index Term(s): Canada; Mediation; Restitution programs
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.