skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 118439 Find in a Library
Title: California v. (Verus) Greenwood: Did the United States Supreme Court Trash the Fourth Amendment?
Journal: Criminal Justice Journal  Volume:11  Issue:1  Dated:(Fall-Winter 1988)  Pages:267-284
Author(s): C H Manning
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 18
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In California v. Greenwood, the U.S. Supreme Court, by refusing to extend fourth amendment protections to garbage left at the curb, failed to acknowledge American societal mores crucial to the protection of an individual's privacy.
Abstract: The Court held that Greenwood had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the garbage bags themselves. Merely setting out the bags where they could be viewed by the public, however, did not divulge their contents to any member of the public; therefore, Greenwood retained his reasonable expectation of privacy as to the content. Greenwood did not voluntarily convey the contents of his garbage to the collector and assume the risk the collector would, in turn, reveal the contents to the police. Greenwood's presumption was that his sealed trash bag would remain closed, become co-mingled with the trash of others, and finally be deposited at the city dump. Further, there were no exigent circumstances that precluded the obtaining of a search warrant. If the police had probable cause to believe the garbage would be lost or destroyed by collection if they waited for a warrant before seizing it, the garbage bags could have been seized and searched under the exigent circumstances exception. The bags could also have been seized and held until such time as a search warrant could be obtained. In Greenwood's case, however, there were no exigent circumstances, since there was sufficient probable cause and time to get a warrant prior to the search. 127 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Warrantless search
Index Term(s): Right of privacy; Search and seizure; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.