skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 118490 Find in a Library
Title: DNA Fingerprinting
Journal: Technology Review  Volume:91  Dated:(February/March 1988)  Pages:8-10
Author(s): S Strauss
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 2
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reviews the nature of DNA fingerprinting and its applications in various types of investigations.
Abstract: In the early 1980's Alec Jeffreys found that an individual's hypervariable DNA pattern is so special that only two people in perhaps hundreds of millions have the same one. DNA fingerprinting is important, because although conventional blood tests have become increasingly sophisticated in identifying individuals, the same cannot be said for semen samples. Traditional methods often cannot determine more than blood type from semen stains. The new approach uses DNA from blood, skin, hair, or semen. Sample fragments are combined with radioactive bits of other DNA so that each hypervariable sector leaves a print of dark bands on film. The sequence of these bands, which shows how the DNA's four component proteins are arranged, is the fingerprint. Although DNA fingerprinting may be used in murder or rape cases, its most widespread application is in parenthood and immigration cases. Advantages of DNA fingerprinting are that it is still reliable when drawn from decomposed samples and from samples as old as 4 years. Compulsory large-scale testing of possible crime suspects or other persons might be unconstitutional in the United States. A suggestion that convicted sex offenders provide blood samples as a condition for parole could provoke objections on such grounds.
Main Term(s): DNA fingerprinting
Index Term(s): Investigative techniques; Rape investigations; Suspect identification
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=118490

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.