skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 118538 Find in a Library
Title: Establishing Health and Fitness Standards -- Legal Considerations
Journal: FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin  Volume:58  Issue:6  Dated:(June 1989)  Pages:25-30
Author(s): D L Schofield
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Publisher: https://www.fbi.gov 
Type: Issue Overview
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The legality of law enforcement administrators to enforce reasonable health and fitness standards that promote good health and job-related fitness in a positive manner is addressed.
Abstract: The implementation and enforcement of mandatory health and fitness standards in a law enforcement organization raises potential legal issues under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and under the Constitution. All mandatory fitness standards must be reasonable to be legally enforceable. Only enforcement of mandatory standards that have a "rational basis" and are fairly implemented is permitted by the Constitution. The legality under Title VII of a particular standard often depends on its impact, e.g. mandatory standards with a disparate impact on women must be justified by proof of job relatedness. A discussion is made of court decisions that illustrate the differing levels of governmental justification necessary to establish the legality of various mandatory standards.
Main Term(s): Physical fitness; Police standards
Index Term(s): Judicial decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=118538

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.