skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 118845 Find in a Library
Title: Probation Supervision Fees: Shifting Costs to the Offender
Journal: Federal Probation  Volume:53  Issue:2  Dated:(June 1989)  Pages:43-48
Author(s): C R Ring
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 6
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Although collecting and administering offender probation fees are not without problems, there is no evidence to support claims that such activities will be unfair, excessively time consuming, difficult, or costly.
Abstract: In recent years, proposals to shift the cost of probation from the taxpayer to the offender have garnered increasing support. The number of States which have authorized the imposition of some form of probation fee have more than doubled since 1980; nonetheless, debate over these fees continues. On balance, most of the objections against probation fees can be addressed either in the enabling legislation or the administration of the fee program. Concerns that individuals might be incarcerated solely for inability to pay their fees can be resolved with provisions for indigency exclusions and community service alternatives. Fears that probation fees will compete with and sometimes displace restitution payments, victim/witness fees, or other court-ordered payments can be allayed by establishing a formal procedure for determining the order in which various financial obligations shall be satisfied. In other instances, the objections raised by opponents are not borne out by the experience of States currently operating fee programs. Officials in most jurisdictions with fee programs report few problems and substantial benefits. 13 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Correctional supervision fees
Index Term(s): Probation conditions; Probation costs
Note: This article is based on a report published by the Massachusetts Legislative Research Bureau.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.