skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 118869 Find in a Library
Title: Innovation and Reform in Courts: A Cross-Cultural Perspective
Journal: Justice System Journal  Volume:13  Issue:2  Dated:(1988-89)  Pages:158-167
Author(s): D M Provine; C Seron
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 10
Type: Survey (Cross-Cultural)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This essay suggests an analytic framework for the cross-cultural analysis of court reform, with England, Italy, Germany, and the United States being points of reference.
Abstract: Cross-cultural comparison helps place the events of one nation into a framework that takes account of broader historical trends. In the case of courts, the broad trend is apparently toward ever greater concern with speed, cost, and accessibility in processing disputes. Common issues raised in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, and the United States are barriers to the use of courts to resolve private disputes; control of the pretrial process; and the appropriate balance between the rights of individuals and the organizational imperatives of cost containment, efficiency, and effectiveness. There are two contending models of justice in the reform debates. The first is a due-process model that emphasizes the full-blown ritual of the adversarial process regardless of the time and cost involved. The alternative is a managed model of justice that constrains adversarial excesses in the interest of a more efficient and ultimately fairer process. Although the locus of court concerns varies cross-culturally, all postindustrial nations are experiencing similar pressures to perform with diminishing resources. 28 references.
Main Term(s): Civil proceedings; Court reform
Index Term(s): England; Germany; Italy; US/foreign comparisons
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=118869

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.