skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 118879 Find in a Library
Title: Four Faces of State Constitutional Separation of Powers: Challenges to Speedy Trial and Speedy Disposition Provisions
Journal: Temple Law Review  Volume:62  Issue:1  Dated:(Spring 1989)  Pages:177-219
Author(s): N C McCabe
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 43
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article focuses on four aspects of a perceived conflict between State constitutional separation-of-powers principles and statutes or court rules providing for the speedy trial or speedy disposition of cases.
Abstract: The article discusses the general development of State separation theory, and decisions regarding the constitutionality of the Federal Speedy Trial Act (FSTA) are examined to provide a basis for the analysis of State court opinions, some of which expressly rely on the FSTA cases. An investigation of cases involving State speedy trial and speedy disposition acts or rules addresses whether statutes mandating speedy decisionmaking by the courts impermissibly encroach on the judicial power. Also analyzed is the argument that a court's creation of a speedy trial rule unconstitutionally invades the legislative or executive realms. The other two issues considered are the claim that a speedy trial statute is an invalid legislative infringement on the courts' power and the contention that a speedy trial provision is an unconstitutional intrusion on the prosecutor's power. 336 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Separation of powers; Speedy Trial Act of 1974
Index Term(s): State government
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.