skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 118961 Find in a Library
Title: Voting Rights Act: Are Its Provisions Applicable to the Judiciary?
Journal: State Court Journal  Volume:13  Issue:3  Dated:(Summer 1989)  Pages:24-28
Author(s): D K Knoebel
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 5
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines how elected judges could be affected by Federal court decisions affirming that they are representatives and therefore fall under provisions of the Federal Voting Rights Act.
Abstract: One of the purposes of the Voting Rights Act is to outlaw any discriminatory election schemes that permit a bloc voting majority, over a substantial time period, consistently to defeat minority candidates or candidates identified with the interests of a racial or language minority. In determining whether judicial elections come under the Voting Rights Act, the courts have focused on whether elected judges are "representatives" of the people. Federal court decisions have affirmed that judges are representatives and fall under provisions of the Voting Rights Act. One way to address allegations of discrimination in judicial elections under the Voting Rights Act is to redistrict existing judicial election boundaries. This could dissolve existing judgeships, impact judicial residency requirements, remove the focus from caseload as a determinant of districting, and undermine the current thrust toward centralizing court administration. Another alternative is to move to merit selection, but this may be viewed as a move to further disenfranchise minority voters' rights. In some States, such a move would have to be cleared under the Voting Rights Act. 14 notes.
Main Term(s): Judge retention elections
Index Term(s): Discrimination; Judge selection
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.