skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 119114 Find in a Library
Title: Grievance Procedures for Prisoners (From Current Australian Trends in Corrections, P 62-74, 1988, David Biles, ed. -- See NCJ-119105)
Author(s): C L Johnson
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: Federation Press (Distributed by Gaunt)
Annandale, NSW 2038, Australia
Sale Source: Federation Press (Distributed by Gaunt)
71 Johnson Street
P.O. Box 45
Annandale, NSW 2038,
Australia
Type: Issue Overview
Language: English
Country: Australia
Annotation: The many types of grievance procedures available to prisoners in Australia and other countries will be ineffective unless governments and prison administrators actively seek to respond to legitimate grievances quickly and meaningfully and to administer prisons in a firm and consistent but humane manner so that the need to resort to grievance resolution mechanisms is kept to a minimum.
Abstract: To be effective, a grievance resolution procedure must allow prisoners to make complaints quickly to an outside authority that is independent, has access to the highest level of decisionmaking, and can provide prompt responses. The widespread availability of grievance procedures suggests recognition of the need to take prisoners' complaints seriously, not only for their benefit but also for the benefit of prison administrators as well. Current procedures in Australia or elsewhere include complaints to prison superintendents, the use of a visiting magistrate, boards of visitors, the use of political or administrative heads, official visitor systems, human rights commissions, the courts, inmate councils, the ombudsman, and the prison ombudsman. Each method has advantages as well as limitations, and different procedures are required for different complaints.
Main Term(s): Inmate grievances
Index Term(s): Australia; Complaint processing; Corrections in foreign countries; Ombudsmen
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=119114

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.