skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 119182 Find in a Library
Title: Citizen Knowledge and Voting in Judicial Elections
Journal: Judicature  Volume:73  Issue:1  Dated:(June-July 1989)  Pages:28-33
Author(s): N P Lovrich; J C Pierce; C H Sheldon
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 6
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Survey data gathered from 1197 registered voters in the Spokane, Wash. metropolitan area formed the basis of an analysis of the characteristics of the judicial electorate, as shown by how voters and nonvoters differ with respect to their knowledge of the courts and public affairs.
Abstract: The survey was part of a major study of the quality and level of county government services in the area. In each of 10 sections, the survey gathered information on perceptions of the quality and adequacy of services, frequency of contact with the service agency, self-assessed level of knowledge about that area of county government, and actual level of knowledge. Findings suggested that voter knowledge is of primary importance in the dynamics of electorate formation in the nonpartisan primary elections that determine the outcomes of most judicial elections. Voters had accurate perceptions of their own levels of knowledge and their voting participation depended strongly on their actual knowledge of the courts. Thus, judicial electorates are a self-selected group and would benefit from thorough media coverage of judicial election contests. Tables and figure.
Main Term(s): Judge selection; Public Opinion of the Courts
Index Term(s): Individual behavior; Information dissemination; Judge retention elections; Judicial elections; Washington
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=119182

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.