skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 119184 Find in a Library
Title: United States District Courts En Banc: Resolving the Ambiguities
Journal: Judicature  Volume:73  Issue:1  Dated:(June-July 1989)  Pages:40-42
Author(s): J R Bartels
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 3
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The use of full-bench (en banc) Federal District Courts appears to be increasing, but the lack of uniformity in initiation, conduct, and effect has caused procedural and policy ambiguities that need to be eliminated.
Abstract: Of the 47 en banc panels convened over the last 60 years, 14 were held in 1988. However, this practice cannot be called established, although it apparently is authorized by judicial interpretation of Federal law. These panels are used in situations ranging from final disposition of cases to deciding specific legal issues within cases. The use of the en banc procedure has grown without guidance. This lack of guidance has caused many ambiguities regarding the initiation of the panels, the reasons why they are convened, the number of judges on them, and their effect. These ambiguities are undesirable in courts of law governed by procedure and should be resolved either through legislation or through a determination to use them only when initiated by a majority of the full court and with the participation of all members. 32 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Marxism
Index Term(s): Court reform; En banc courts; Judicial discretion
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=119184

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.