skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 119413 Find in a Library
Title: Consciousness: The Most Critical Moral (Constitutional) Standard for Human Personhood
Journal: American Journal of Law and Medicine  Volume:13  Issue:2 & 3  Dated:(1987)  Pages:233-248
Author(s): R E Cranford; D R Smith
Date Published: 1987
Page Count: 16
Type: Issue Overview
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article argues that consciousness is the appropriate legal, constitutional, and moral standard for human personhood and points out that Roe v. Wade should have focused on consciousness, not viability, in balancing maternal and fetal rights.
Abstract: A state of permanent unconsciousness causes a loss of human personhood. There are three major clinical types of permanently unconscious patients: those in an eyes-open, persistent vegetative state; those in an eye-closed, coma state; and anencephalic infants. The state of the pre-conscious fetus is also permanent unconsciousness. Because the state of permanently unconscious individuals cannot be improved by medicine or medical treatment, they are more like the dead than the living. The moral, legal, and constitutional considerations affecting the medical care and treatment of permanently unconscious patients are discussed in detail. Those who lack consciousness and personhood also lack constitutional rights since all rights enumerated by the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights are predicated on consciousness. 45 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Abortion
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Euthanasia; Medicolegal considerations
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=119413

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.