skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 119523 Find in a Library
Title: Alternative Method of Capital Jury Selection
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:13  Issue:2  Dated:(June 1989)  Pages:167-183
Author(s): M Cox; S Tanford
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 16
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The purpose of this research was to develop and evaluate an alternative method of capital jury selection.
Abstract: Subjects determined to be excludable and nonexcludable for capital jury service were exposed to a crime questionnaire containing 16 brutal crimes. Sixty-five percent of the excludables indicated that they would consider imposing the death penalty in one or more scenarios and within forty-eight hours, seventy-six percent maintained a new position. The rehabilitated excludables were more tolerant of ambiguity and more due process oriented than the nonexcludables. A second study showed that the crime questionnaire did produce a small amount of bias against the defendants in terms of conviction rates and penalties. The advantages of the alternative system for providing an objective, standardized questioning procedure and a less biased jury are discussed. 47 references, 2 tables. (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Capital punishment; Jury selection
Index Term(s): Juror characteristics
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=119523

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.