skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 119857 Find in a Library
Title: Guideline Sentencing: Probation Officer Responsibilities and Interagency Issues
Journal: Federal Probation  Volume:53  Issue:3  Dated:(September 1989)  Pages:3-11
Author(s): J S Dierna
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 9
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Report (Technical)
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Guideline sentencing under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 has redefined the roles and responsibilities of Federal probation officers during the sentencing process by requiring them to make important guideline-related decisions during their presentencing investigations.
Abstract: These decisions may affect the defendant's sentence in the United States district court. These guideline tasks are extremely important and should be monitored by probation management staff in each office and the Probation Division of the Administrative Office of the Courts. Communication is the most important component in identifying and resolving problems related to establishing the facts of the case or addressing circumvention of the guidelines by prosecutors. Thus, Federal probation officers and districts must initiate routine discussions to address these issues and fulfill their responsibilities. It is of utmost importance for Federal probation officers to work diligently as part of a unified system to uphold these responsibilities and accomplish guideline tasks in an effective and professional manner. 8 references.
Main Term(s): Presentence investigations
Index Term(s): Probation or parole decisionmaking; Sentencing guideline compliance; Sentencing recommendations
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.