skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 119902 Find in a Library
Title: Chronic Delinquent: Some Clarifications of a Vague Concept
Journal: Juvenile and Family Court Journal  Volume:40  Issue:3  Dated:(1989)  Pages:37-44
Author(s): R G Shelden
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 8
Type: Research (Applied/Empirical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article reviews longitudinal studies of delinquents and attempts to clarify the term chronic delinquent by reporting on a study of 863 delinquents.
Abstract: While longitudinal studies of delinquents and their behavior are extremely helpful, a review of the literature shows that the term chronic delinquent is poorly defined. A longitudinal study of 863 youths first referred to juvenile court in 1980 in Las Vegas, Nevada revealed two distinct categories of chronic offenders: chronic serious offenders and chronic nuisance offenders. Chronic serious offenders comprised 7.5 percent of the total and included those charged with felonies such as robbery and burglary. Chronic nuisance offenders comprised 9.4 percent of the total and included those who were not seriously criminal or disturbed. Instead, they committed status offenses; were petty thieves; or were runaways, truants, or loiterers. Chronic serious offenders were more likely to be school drop-outs, non-white, and male, and their first referral to the juvenile justice system was for a serious property crime. The article concludes by recommending that researchers avoid grouping chronic serious and chronic nuisance offenders and look at the differences in the nature of each group's first referral charge. 11 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Juvenile offender classification
Index Term(s): Juvenile justice research; Juvenile Recidivism; Labeling theory
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.