skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 120117 Find in a Library
Title: Voting Rights Act and Judicial Elections Litigation: The Plaintiffs' Perspective
Journal: Judicature  Volume:73  Issue:2  Dated:(August-September 1989)  Pages:82-86,118
Author(s): R McDuff; R E Weber
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 6
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: These two articles consider the arguments for plaintiffs and defendants in cases challenging judicial elections under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Abstract: Although defendants have claimed that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act does not apply to judicial elections, the Federal courts have resolved the dispute for the plaintiffs by holding that Section 2 does apply to judicial elections, since judges are elected public officials. The article presenting the plaintiff's perspective argues that the best remedy for noncompliance is the division of existing at-large districts into smaller subdistricts for the elections of judges, with some of the subdistricts containing black or Hispanic majorities sufficient to elect candidates of choice. State defendants claim that the single-member election subdistrict remedy may not always be the best solution to vote dilution by at-large election systems. They argue that multimember election subdistricts should be adopted if at all possible when the minority population is sufficiently large. They also suggest that staggered term and place elections systems can be used when the election subdistricts are sufficiently homogeneous that the systems will not have the effect of acting as anti-single-shot voting impediments to voting participation.
Main Term(s): Judge retention elections
Index Term(s): Judge selection; Racial discrimination
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.