skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 120118 Find in a Library
Title: When Blacks Run for Judge: Racial Divisions in the Candidate Preferences of Louisiana Voters
Journal: Judicature  Volume:73  Issue:2  Dated:(August-September 1989)  Pages:87-89
Author(s): R L Engstrom
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 3
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines data in 52 Louisiana judicial elections in which voters had a choice between or among black and white candidates to determine whether there is empirical evidence for the litigation claim that minority voters have candidate preferences in judicial elections that are not shared by other voters.
Abstract: Given the existence of such a circumstance, the argument continues that the minority preferences will usually be defeated due to the manner in which electoral competition has been structured (e.g., citywide or countywide voting in majority white or Anglo jurisdictions). The racial or ethnic compositions of voting precincts normally differ. If these differences relate in a systematic way to the level of support a candidate receives in those precincts, it is possible to estimate through standard statistical procedures the percentage of the votes cast by minority voters and other voters that were in favor of that candidate. Overall, in 52 judicial elections in Louisiana held from 1978 through April 1988 offering voters a biracial choice of candidates, black voters preferred black candidates in 90.4 percent. This preference was never shared by white voters. This consistent racial polarization in candidate preferences was one of the critical factors that led the Federal district court to conclude that Louisiana's judicial election system violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. 2 tables, 9 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Judge retention elections
Index Term(s): Judge selection; Louisiana; Racial discrimination
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.