skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 120141 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Constitutionality of Drug Testing at the Bail Stage
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology  Volume:80  Issue:1  Dated:(Spring 1989)  Pages:114-176
Author(s): C J Rosen; J S Goldkamp
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 63
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
Temple University
Philadelphia, PA 19122
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 87-IJ-CX-0007
Dataset: DATASET 1
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article examines issues arising under the fourth, fifth, and fourteenth amendments when defendants entering the criminal process in the District of Columbia are tested for drugs and discusses the constitutionality of bail stage drug testing programs.
Abstract: Because bail stage drug tests are done quickly and the results made available to the court for pretrial release deliberations, there is a likelihood of inaccuracy and error. Additionally, to require a person arrested for a crime to produce urine samples that will be tested for drug use even before the individual appears before a judge raises serious constitutional questions: the fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination; the right to due process, protected by the fifth and fourteenth amendments; and the prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures contained in the fourth amendment. Of these, the most difficult is whether bail stage urinalysis tests for drugs violate the accused's fourth amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. The article points out that bail stage urinalysis is constitutional if it is reasonable and voluntary. If jurisdictions have bail stage urinalysis programs that do not meet reasonableness and voluntariness tests, they must modify their programs in order to conform to fourth amendment requirements. 245 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Pretrial drug testing
Index Term(s): Bail hearing; Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; District of Columbia; Drug testing; Legal privacy protection
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.