skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 120293 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Official's Reactions to Sentencing Guidelines
Journal: Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency  Volume:25  Issue:2  Dated:(May 1988)  Pages:170-187
Author(s): T D Miethe; C A Moore
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 18
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice (NIJ)
Washington, DC 20531
US Dept of Justice NIJ Pub
Washington, DC 20531
Grant Number: 85-IJ-CY-0054
Type: Survey
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: An assessment of the attitudes and experiences of criminal justice officials has been overlooked as a factor in the evaluation of criminal justice reform.
Abstract: This study uses data collected from a mail survey on the Minnesota felony sentencing guidelines. The survey was sent to a statewide sample of 200 criminal court judges, prosecutors, and public defenders. This study shows that officials' opposition to sentencing guidelines does not dissipate over time and varies according to their occupational status. The authors argue that the level of opposition may be indicative of the effectiveness of the guidelines in achieving their objectives. The authors believe that a survey approach is necessary for identifying problems with a new program and the feasibility of alternative policies. Other States considering reform are advised that the implementation of reform programs engenders ongoing contention and power struggles among conflicting interest groups. 4 Tables, 11 Notes, 22 References. (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Sentencing guidelines
Index Term(s): Criminal justice system personnel; Sentencing reform
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.