skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 120512 Find in a Library
Title: Teenagers, Prisons and the Courts
Corporate Author: Prison Reform Trust
United Kingdom
Date Published: 1988
Page Count: 7
Sponsoring Agency: Prison Reform Trust
London , EC1V 0JR
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United Kingdom
Annotation: Although the British 1982 Criminal Justice Act has resulted in a decline of custody for juveniles aged 14-16, it has not produced a similar decline in custody for young adults aged 17-20.
Abstract: In 1986, 20,600 offenders aged 17-20 were sent to prison, a number far exceeding the numbers of juveniles sentenced to immediate custody and representing half the total figure for those over 21 years old. The proportion of young adult males receiving immediate custodial sentences has steadily increased over the past 10 years. There is, however, a disturbing disparity in the sentencing of 17-20 year-olds in both Crown courts and magistrates courts in various jurisdictions. Data indicate that neither offense seriousness nor criminal history provide complete explanations for the greater risk of custody for young adults. There is persuasive evidence that this age group receives harsher sentences because sentencers perceive this group as more unruly, disruptive, and criminally oriented than other age groups. Policy should focus on providing noncustodial alternatives for young adults similar to those for juveniles. This would include alternatives akin to intermediate treatment for juveniles and greater use of probation. 3 tables.
Main Term(s): Juvenile sentencing
Index Term(s): Sentencing disparity; United Kingdom (UK)
Note: Young Offenders Project Paper 1.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=120512

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.