skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 120550 Find in a Library
Title: Investigative Hypnosis (From Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence P 151-190, 1989, David C. Raskin, ed. -- See NCJ-120545)
Author(s): M Reiser
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 40
Sponsoring Agency: Springer Publishing Co
New York, NY 10036
Sale Source: Springer Publishing Co
11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10036
United States of America
Type: Issue Overview
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article covers the investigative hypnosis process, its history, its applicability, and legal and political issues.
Abstract: According to pervasive myths, hypnosis is mind control and has truth-detecting or truth-compelling capability, but in fact the hypnotized subject retains volitional control. The investigative hypnosis process is divided into seven phases: 1) a preliminary review of basic crime information; 2) the preinduction phase used to set up the instruments of the session and build rapport with the subject; 3) the induction phase in which hypnosis begins; 4) the deepening phase in which the subject is brought to an optimal level of comfort and functioning; 5) information elicitation in which crime scene and time parameters are established for recall; 6) the posthypnotic suggestions phase which increases the possibility of later recall; and 7) the dehypnotization phase. A 1987 study of seven solved cases and nine subjects compared standard and hypnosis interviews of each subject and found an average 177 percent increase in information in the hypnosis interviews. Three crime cases illustrate how victims questioned under hypnosis recalled information that was otherwise unobtainable and led to the identification, apprehension, and conviction of the criminals. 166 references.
Main Term(s): Questioning under hypnosis
Index Term(s): Criminal investigation; Eyewitness testimony; Interview and interrogation; Investigative hypnosis training
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=120550

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.