skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 121039 Find in a Library
Title: Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Prosecutions: A Spectrum of Uses (From Criminal Law Review - 1989, P 463-500, 1989, James G. Carr, ed. -- See NCJ-121027)
Author(s): V Serrato
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 38
Sponsoring Agency: Clark Boardman Company, Ltd
New York, NY 10014
Sale Source: Clark Boardman Company, Ltd
435 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10014
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The benefits and difficulties of expert testimony in child sexual abuse prosecutions are discussed, focusing on how the behavioral characteristics of sexually abused children influence their credibility as witnesses and proposing categories for analyzing the merit of expert witness testimony derived from analyzing testimony in child abuse cases.
Abstract: Child sexual abuse victims are often not good witnesses because they are frightened and because developmentally and psychologically they are not able to give consistent details of their sexual abuse. Jurors often hold misperceptions of the nature of child sexual abuse, and these are also impediments to accurately assessing crimes against children. The expert witness, then, plays a role in helping judges and jurors to understand and evaluate the testimony of the child witnesses. Expert witness testimony falls along a spectrum of increasingly high impact in identifying the guilt or innocence of the defendant and fits into seven categories: refutation of defense counsel claims; common characteristics of sexually abused children; general veracity of children alleging sexual abuse; veracity of a particular child witness; matching general characteristics of sexually abused children with those of the child witness; common characteristics of sexual abusers of children; and expert testimony on the abuser's identity. Courts should admit expert testimony in all areas of the spectrum except the last, which should be inadmissible because the expert is not competent to testify on the defendant's actions without evaluating the defendant. 242 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Child Sexual Abuse
Index Term(s): Children in the courtroom; Expert witnesses; Juvenile witnesses; Witness credibility
Note: Reprinted from Boston University Law Review, V 68 (1988), P 155-192
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.