skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 121041 Find in a Library
Title: Limited Impact of Nix v. Whiteside on Attorney-Client Relations (From Criminal Law Review - 1989, P 551-576, 1989, James G. Carr, ed. -- See NCJ-121027)
Author(s): B R Appel
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 26
Sponsoring Agency: Clark Boardman Company, Ltd
New York, NY 10014
Sale Source: Clark Boardman Company, Ltd
435 Hudson Street
New York, NY 10014
United States of America
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article discusses the impact of Nix v. Whiteside on the debate over an attorney's ethical and constitutional obligations when a client expresses the intent to commit perjury at trial.
Abstract: For years American attorneys and judges have debated a lawyer's role when a client says he plans to commit perjury at trial. In Nix v. Whiteside a defense attorney persuaded his client not to present what the attorney believed to be perjured testimony at trial. In admonishing his client, the attorney pointed out that he might be allowed to withdraw as counsel and impeach any untruthful testimony offered by the client at trial. The Supreme Court of Iowa and the Federal district court held that the lawyer's approach was constitutional, but the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that the defendant's constitutional rights were violated by the attorney's action. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the facts of Nix v. Whiteside did not prevent the State of Iowa from imposing criminal sanctions against the defendant Whiteside. The article discusses the ethical and constitutional issues that arise in the client perjury dilemma, pointing out that ethical rules governing attorney behavior arise from State and not Federal constitutional law and that States can determine their own solutions to the problem. The impact of the Whiteside case on attorney-client relations is also discussed. 161 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Perjury
Index Term(s): Attorney client relations; Defendants; False evidence; Legal malpractice; Professional conduct and ethics; Right to counsel
Note: Reprinted from University of Pennsylvania Law Review, V 136 (1988), P 1913-1938
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=121041

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.