skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 121079 Find in a Library
Title: Why the Constitution Survives: Long-Term View of the Court
Journal: Trial  Volume:25  Issue:12  Dated:(December 1989)  Pages:30-35
Author(s): E L Barrett Jr
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 6
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The U.S. Constitution, drafted over 200 years ago, survives because the people of the United States continue to acknowledge that the Supreme Court is the institution with the last word in determining the meaning of the Constitution.
Abstract: Even though our Federal government functions as three co-equal branches: the legislative, the judiciary, and the executive; the only unelected branch, the judiciary, defines the meaning of the Constitution. The role of Chief Justice John Marshall in making it possible for the U.S. Supreme Court to become the ultimate interpreter of the Constitution is discussed in detail, with particular emphasis on his opinion in Marbury v. Madison. Other important challenges to the Court's assertion that it alone should define the Constitution are also discussed, as is the Court's role in establishing constitutional doctrines and their acceptance. The Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education invalidated racial segregation in public education, thus paving the way for making all forms of public racial discrimination invalid under the Constitution. Public acceptance and support of the Court's role is fragile, something that those who would have the Court move very fast or too slowly on certain issues should remember. 17 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Separation of powers
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Judicial process; Legal doctrines; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=121079

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.