Home / Publications / NCJRS Abstract

PUBLICATIONS

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

NCJ Number:	121080

Title:	Law's Geometry and the Curvature of Constitutional Space

Journal:	Trial Volume:25 Issue:12 Dated:(December 1989) Pages:37-45

Author(s):	L H Tribe

Date Published:	1989

Page Count:	9

Type:	Legislation/Policy Analysis

Format:	Article

Language:	English

Country:	United States of America

Annotation:	This article draws upon the perceptions of contemporary physics to discuss the process of constitutional analysis.

Abstract:	The dynamic quality of modern physics is contrasted with the static world view of Newtonian physics, and this general comparison is applied to constitutional analysis and decisionmaking. A Newtonian view of the legal system defines government as a thing or a physical entity that acts upon citizens' lives from a distance. Courts are thus passive and detached observers. When government is viewed from an understanding of general relativity and quantum theory, however, government action has a dynamic of and in itself that changes the social landscape through its interaction with it. Human interactions are redirected as a result of governmental action; pervasive interaction occurs between the observer and the phenomena observed. The traditional judicial doctrine of stare decisis reflects a judicial awareness of the principle that as judges define the legal landscape they also alter it. The way in which the Supreme Court determined the course of the legal landscape and responded to governmental action in De Shaney v. Winnebago County is discussed in detail.

Main Term(s):	Judicial system development

Index Term(s):	Judicial process; Judicial review; Legal doctrines; US Supreme Court decisions



	To cite this abstract, use the following link: http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=121080

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.

PUBLICATIONS

NCJRS Abstract

Find in a Library