skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 121085 Find in a Library
Title: Constitutional Doctrine and Political Direction
Journal: Trial  Volume:25  Issue:12  Dated:(December 1989)  Pages:72-75,77
Author(s): R F Nagel
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 5
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This article analyzes the opinions of Justices Scalia and Brennan in Michael H. v. Gerald D., emphasizing how Justice Scalia put forth an argument challenging the assumptions relied on by Justice Brennan.
Abstract: Justice Scalia asserts traditional values about the roles of husbands, wives, and parents and challenges Justice Brennan's tolerance of adultery and fatalism about the future. Justice Scalia asserts that the purpose of the Constitution is to function as a link to the past rather than as an ever-fluctuating document that must respond to change. The past can be used by political institutions to shape the future, Justice Scalia asserts. Justice Brennan, on the other hand, sees change as good, for it permits new beginnings, free from inherited prejudice and superstitions. While the outcome of the Scalia-Brennan discussion is not momentous for constitutional law, it signals vast differences in values separating some of the Justices. These differences will not shape the direction of the Court unless new judicial appointees share Justice Scalia's intellectual vigor and independence and take issue with underlying analytic norms. 10 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Judicial attitudes
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Judicial decisions; Legal doctrines; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=121085

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.