skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 121137 Find in a Library
Title: U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and Police Officer Discretion (From U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Implications for Criminal Justice, P 21-31, 1989, Dean J. Champion, ed. -- See NCJ-121135)
Author(s): W C Terry III
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 11
Sponsoring Agency: Praeger Publishers
Westport, CT 06881
Sale Source: Praeger Publishers
88 Post Road West
Westport, CT 06881
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Given the current state of disagreement over the constitutionality of sentencing guidelines, especially at the Federal level, they apparently have had little effect on Federal law enforcement officers.
Abstract: Moreover, sentencing processes in general are too far removed organizationally from the daily work of police officers to have much effect. Nevertheless, there are some similarities between judicial and police behavior and decisionmaking worthy of note. Both judges and police officers are forced to act upon information provided them. They decide which actions to take based upon this information and upon prior experience in similar or related matters. Also, they share accusations of exercising unwarranted discretion whereby sentencing disparities and inequities are incurred by offenders. Both are subject to efforts to limit the degree of these disparities and alleged inequities. Neither guidelines to limit judicial discretion nor police discretion are designed to eliminate discretion, but rather to provide greater uniformity in official decisionmaking. 7 notes.
Main Term(s): Police discretion; Sentencing guidelines
Index Term(s): Federal Code; Sentencing commissions; Sentencing reform
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=121137

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.