skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 121215 Find in a Library
Title: Package Plea Bargaining and the Prosecutor's Duty of Good Faith
Journal: Criminal Law Bulletin  Volume:25  Issue:6  Dated:(November-December 1989)  Pages:507-549
Author(s): B A Green
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 43
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The ethics of package or containment plea bargaining, used in criminal cases with multiple defendants, is examined in detail.
Abstract: While State and lower Federal courts have approved package or containment plea agreements granting one defendant more lenient treatment if a second defendant pleads guilty, the Supreme Court has not yet addressed the propriety of such agreements. The article examines the constitutional challenges to package plea bargaining, including the possibility of coercion when multiple defendants are related to one another. In proposing contingent plea offers to related and unrelated co-defendants, prosecutors must exercise good faith, for there are dangers that one defendant may pressure another to plead guilty. Judges presiding over package plea bargaining have an obligation to define appropriate standard practice among prosecutors purporting to offer containment plea bargains, and they should conduct hearings to examine the attorneys' reasons for offering package plea bargains. For their part, prosecutors should take a restrictive approach to proposing package plea offers and should use them only to conserve prosecutorial resources when the trial of the jointly-charged multiple defendants would not be much longer than the trial of any single defendant. (Author abstract modified.) 146 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Plea negotiations
Index Term(s): Coercive persuasion of offenders; Defendants; Groups; Prosecutorial discretion
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=121215

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.