skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 121383 Find in a Library
Title: Legal Issues in Drug Testing Probation and Parole Clients and Employees
Author(s): R V Carmen; del; J R Sorensen
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 34
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Corrections
Washington, DC 20534
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Grant Number: TA #88C0012
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Issue Overview
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This report explores the legal issues surrounding drug testing in probation and parole and considers the issue of testing probation and parole officers.
Abstract: Although probation and parole are separate agencies in most States, probationers and parolees have similar legal status with regard to drug testing. While drug testing has generally been upheld as a condition of probation, probationers have often attacked the practice on constitutional grounds. Many cases have challenged urine testing as a violation of five constitutional rights: right against unreasonable search and seizure, right to due process, right to confrontation and cross-examination, right to equal protection, and right against self-incrimination. Since none of the cases have upheld constitutional challenges to drug testing, probation and parole agencies may require clients to submit their urine for drug testing. This is because convicted offenders have diminished constitutional rights relative to the general population, and whatever constitutional rights remain are balanced against offender rehabilitation and the protection of society. The extent of drug testing of probation and parole officers is unknown, and there are no court cases challenging such practice. Being government employees, however, probation and parole officers can be compared to other public employees where courts have decided drug testing cases. Cases involving drug testing of public employees raise essentially the same constitutional issues as those challenging probation and parole client testing. The difference relates to the scope of constitutional rights involved and the State's jurisdiction for curtailing those rights. Court decisions involving probation and parole officers indicate that drug testing may be allowed under narrow and limited conditions. 39 references.
Main Term(s): Drug testing
Index Term(s): Constitutional Rights/Civil Liberties; Parolees rights; Probationers rights; Urinalysis
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.