skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 122139 Find in a Library
Title: Update on Drug and Alcohol Screening of Law Enforcement Personnel
Journal: Prosecutor  Volume:23  Issue:1  Dated:(Summer 1989)  Pages:5-6,8-10
Author(s): J P Manak
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 5
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: In two cases, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld mandatory drug testing without particularized individual suspicion of drug use, but there are still unanswered questions on employee screening.
Abstract: One Supreme Court case involved required blood and urine drug tests for all crew members of trains involved in serious or major accidents, as well as employees who break safety rules. Another case involved mandatory drug testing as a condition of placement or employment in three job categories of the Customs Service. In both cases, the Court ruled that employees' privacy interests were outweighed by compelling governmental interests protecting public safety. Neither case involved random testing; however, the Federal Government is moving ahead with plans for random testing of some 400,000 Federal employees. On May 19, 1989, a Federal district court in Washington, D.C., issued a temporary restraining order and awarded other relief after Federal workers sued to stop the Bush administration's plans. The court held the drug testing program was too broad, given no evidence of a drug problem among the targeted workers. The court rejected a simple "suspected of using drugs" standard for testing General Services Administration (GSA) employees. The court ruled that testing must be based on a more specific requirement: "reasonable, articulable, and individualized suspicion." Random drug testing was approved for GSA employees who carry firearms. The article cites other cases that have ruled against random drug testing.
Main Term(s): Employee drug testing
Index Term(s): Drug testing; Federal drug laws; Urinalysis; US Supreme Court decisions
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.