skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 122621 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Role of Staff Attorneys and Face-to-Face Conferencing in Non-Argument Decisionmaking
Author(s): D Stienstra; J S Cecil
Corporate Author: Federal Judicial Ctr
United States of America
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 67
Sponsoring Agency: Federal Judicial Ctr
Washington, DC 20002
National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Document
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit appears to have designed an effective procedure for deciding non-argument cases.
Abstract: The study was based primarily on interviews conducted in 1989 with judges, staff attorneys, and several other key participants in the non-argument decisionmaking process. The key feature of this procedure is the conference calendar where a panel of three judges and all the court's staff attorneys meet six times a year and discuss approximately sixty non-argument cases. At the conference, judges discuss each case in turn, calling on the staff attorneys when necessary either for additional information or for their view of the case. At the end of the discussion in each case, the judges decide the case. About one third of the court's merit decisions are disposed of each year by this method. In the judges' view, the conferencing calendar provides an opportunity for face-to-face decisionmaking, which considerably enhances the quality of the decision. Nearly as important, it provides an opportunity for judges and staff attorneys to work together more closely, with benefits for both. Appendix.
Main Term(s): Court case flow management
Index Term(s): Case processing; Court-administered arbitration; Judicial discretion
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=122621

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.