skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 123356 Find in a Library
Title: Reviewing the Unreviewable Judge: Federal Prosecution Appeals of Mid-Trial Evidentiary Rulings
Journal: Yale Law Journal  Volume:99  Issue:4  Dated:(January 1990)  Pages:905-924
Author(s): S J Shapiro
Date Published: 1990
Page Count: 20
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: After examining the problem of the unreviewability of mid-trial judicial evidence rulings adverse to the prosecution in Federal courts, this note proposes a means to address the problem.
Abstract: Under present Federal statutes, the prosecution may only seek review from evidentiary rulings made before jeopardy has attached; consequently, any evidentiary ruling adverse to the prosecution made after the trial has begun is not appealable as an interlocutory ruling. The evidentiary matter can only be appealed after the verdict; however, since the prosecution would only appeal if the defendant is acquitted, appeal is precluded by the double jeopardy clause. The courts have addressed this problem in a number of ways. One circuit court has provided guidelines that specify which evidentiary issues must be decided before trial begins and which may be deferred. At least two district courts have developed a procedural device that converts unappealable mid-trial rulings into appealable pretrial ones through the grant of a mistrial. This note proposes that the problem be addressed by converting unappealable mid-trial suppression orders into appealable pretrial ones. 88 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Appeal procedures; Rules of evidence
Index Term(s): Federal courts; Prosecution
Note: *This document is currently unavailable from NCJRS.
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.