skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 126899 Find in a Library
Title: No Haven in the Courts for the Sanctuary Movement: An Examination of First Amendment and International Law Defenses
Journal: American Criminal Law Review  Volume:27  Issue:2  Dated:(1989)  Pages:431-455
Author(s): R A Hoyer
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 25
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The judicial decisions in two cases involving the transportation of illegal aliens are examined in terms of the first amendment and refugee-status defenses presented by the convicted offenders in their appeals.
Abstract: The cases of Aguilar and Merkt involved volunteers who aided political refugees from El Salvador to enter Texas from Mexico and to obtain transportation in Texas. The two women appealed their convictions on several grounds, including the Salvadoranas' status as refugees rather than illegal aliens and the offenders' right to the free exercise of religion in helping the refugees. The appellate courts declined to reverse the convictions on any of the arguments. The analysis concludes that the Sanctuary movement, which aided the Salvadorans, represents a distinct activity that does not threaten the statutory provisions regarding the harboring or transportation of illegal aliens. In addition, the courts' reasoning regarding religious beliefs is unnecessarily convoluted. Thus, it is clear that the courts acted in a narrow and shortsighted manner that is counter to the growing recognition and respect for human rights worldwide. 173 footnotes
Main Term(s): Immigration offenses
Index Term(s): Illegal Immigrants/Aliens; International law; Legal doctrines; Religious freedom
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=126899

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.