skip navigation


Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.


NCJ Number: 127016 Find in a Library
Title: Commission on Criminal Sanctions and Correctional Facilities
Corporate Author: Georgia Criminal Justice Coordinating Council
United States of America
Project Director: H S Pinyan
Date Published: 1989
Page Count: 108
Sponsoring Agency: Georgia Criminal Justice Coordinating Council
Atlanta, GA 30303-2743
Sale Source: Georgia Criminal Justice Coordinating Council
104 Marietta Street
Suite 440
Atlanta, GA 30303-2743
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Description
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: The Commission on Criminal Sanctions and Correctional Facilities, established by the Georgia General Assembly, identified problems in Georgia's existing criminal justice system and looked at criminal sanction reforms and the development of a criminal sanctions system framework.
Abstract: The commission requested input from a representative cross-section of criminal justice practitioners and public interest groups on existing practices of imposing punishment. The commission also requested statistical data, profiles of criminal justice agency operations, and national research concerning criminal sanction reforms implemented in other jurisdictions. The commission established six criteria that it felt would be necessary to guide efforts to improve Georgia's criminal sanctions system: (1) return to credibility in sentencing with emphasis on ending total dependency on parole guidelines for controlling the prison population; (2) decrease in sentencing disparity that focuses on the consistent use of all supervision types and the need for punishment proportionate to the offense; (3) provision of adequate prison bed space for drug traffickers and violent repeat offenders for specific periods of time; (4) increased availability of punishment alternatives for nonviolent offenders; (5) need to include substance abuse treatment with punishment; and (6) need to insure the manageability of the criminal sanctions system at every level. Potential strategies to address these criteria, including an offender accountability model, are detailed. Appendixes contain supplemental information on prison population projections, parole guidelines, State correctional institutions, probation alternatives, inmate and sentencing statistics, substance abuse and treatment estimates, and the offender accountability model. Tables and figures
Main Term(s): Correctional reform
Index Term(s): Alternatives to institutionalization; Drug treatment; Georgia (USA); Sentencing disparity; State correctional facilities; State Corrections Commissions; State criminal justice systems; State parole guidelines
To cite this abstract, use the following link:

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.