skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 127931 Add to Shopping cart Find in a Library
Title: Victim and Offender Participation Important to Criminal Sentencing Process
Journal: Journal of the National Prison Project  Issue:14  Dated:(Winter 1987)  Pages:9-11
Author(s): R Immarigeon
Date Published: 1987
Page Count: 3
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Sale Source: National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Current criminal justice policy should merge three goals: crime victim restitution, victim and offender reparation, and jail and prison population reduction.
Abstract: In recent years, attorneys, citizen groups, and crime victims have created a rapidly growing victims' rights movement that has significant similarities with the prisoners' rights movement. Prisoners and crime victims are both seeking increased participation in the criminal justice process. Both groups want recognition of their interests in the process. Although there is an inevitable tension between victims' and defendants' concerns in case processing, both the interests of defendants/offenders and victims can be served by appropriate case processing. A case disposition process designed to meet both victim and offender needs would hold offenders accountable for what they have done by the most cost-effective means while providing victim input for case disposition. The interests of offenders and victims can be addressed simultaneously in restitution conferences, where offenders and victims negotiate a restitution settlement. Victims have also shown a willingness to approve nonincarcerative sentences that offer rehabilitative opportunities not present in the prison setting. Under such case processing, both victims and offenders have opportunity to shape a case outcome that is mutually beneficial.
Main Term(s): Victim-offender reconciliation
Index Term(s): Restitution; Victims rights
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=127931

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.