skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 127944 Find in a Library
Title: Slaying the Monsters of Cost and Delay: Would Disclosure Be More Effective Than Discovery?
Journal: Judicature  Volume:74  Issue:4  Dated:(December-January 1991)  Pages:178-183
Author(s): W W Schwarzer
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 6
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Following a review of the problems of discovery in civil litigation, this article proposes a system of mandatory early and ongoing reciprocal disclosure that would replace all discovery other than what the court specifically orders.
Abstract: Legal commentators widely agree that discovery as now conducted spawns some abuse and overuse that produces expense and delay. The proposed alternative requires that the plaintiff, at the time of filing the complaint, submit to the defendant copies of all "material" (having a bearing on the outcome of the action) documents and things, the names and addresses of all persons believed to have material information, and statements informing the opposing party of the material information possessed by persons under its control. Each defendant would be under the same obligation at the time of filing an answer or motion going to the merits of the case. Sufficient time would be allowed defendants to comply. The parties' disclosure obligation would continue throughout the litigation and would require them to disclose matters promptly as they come to their attention. No discovery would be permitted against an adverse party until after full disclosure has been made, and then only by order of the court on a showing of particularized need by the party seeking discovery. This procedure would narrow the scope and reduce the cost and length of litigation compared to the current system of discovery.
Main Term(s): Pretrial discovery
Index Term(s): Civil proceedings; Court delays
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=127944

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.