skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 128612 Find in a Library
Title: Methodological and Design Issues: Techniques for Assessing the Representatives of Snowball Samples (From Collection and Interpretation of Data From Hidden Populations, P 31-43, 1990, Elizabeth Y Lambert, ed. -- See NCJ-128609)
Author(s): K M van Meter
Date Published: 1990
Page Count: 13
Sponsoring Agency: National Institute of Justice/
Rockville, MD 20849
NCJRS Photocopy Services
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
Sale Source: Superintendent of Documents, GPO
Washington, DC 20402
United States of America

National Institute of Justice/
NCJRS paper reproduction
Box 6000, Dept F
Rockville, MD 20849
United States of America

NCJRS Photocopy Services
Box 6000
Rockville, MD 20849-6000
United States of America
Document: PDF
Type: Survey
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: Recent research efforts have provided a formal and operational tie between ascending and descending methodologies used to study hidden populations. Snowball sampling and hierarchically ascending (HA) classification analysis are useful once problems with the calculation of general population estimates and the explanation of variance are resolved.
Abstract: There is an opposition between studying social groups not accessible through established means of sociological research and using research methodologies based on intensive, detailed, data collection strategies. There is also a clear distinction between ascending and descending methods in the case of classification analysis; the classes obtained by HA classification are called polythetic classes. Cross-classification analysis is the Cartesian crossing of two automatic classification analysis and snowball sampling are compatible in ascending methodology and have been used to study drug abusing behavior in several European cities. When conducting this sort of analysis, researchers must be aware of possible random error or sampling error, sample bias, and response bias which are the major sources of inaccuracy in data collection. 31 references
Main Term(s): Ethnomethodology; Sampling
Index Term(s): Data collections; Drug abuse causes; Target groups
Note: NIDA Research Monograph 98
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=128612

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.