skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 128666 Find in a Library
Title: Probation -- Does More Mean Better?
Journal: International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology  Volume:34  Issue:3  Dated:(December 1990)  Pages:vii-xii
Author(s): R G Whitfield
Date Published: 1990
Page Count: 6
Type: Research (Theoretical)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: This editorial analyzes the expansion of intensive probation services (IPS) in the United Kingdom and the United States. It argues that diversifying IPS leads to unrealistic expectations of probation officers and expedient and desperate development of supervision services rather than to goal-oriented planning.
Abstract: The increase in national probation caseloads in the United States and the proportionate use of probation in Britain are cited as examples of current problems in probation. Cost and community control of supervision are cited as reasons for expansion of probation services. Interim research is reviewed to provide insight into an evaluation of such an IPS. In order for an intensive supervision program to be effective, therapeutic integrity, reasonable demands, and offence-specific programs should be present. For politicians and legislators, the benefits of IPS include a solution to the problem; for probation services, the benefits include expansion, opportunities, and more resources. However, the IPS will be beneficial to both the offender and probation officer if it offers the offenders more choice, relevant options, and strong community links preferably with carefully-targeted, small scale projects. Large piecemeal development is not necessarily better. 10 references
Main Term(s): Intensive probation
Index Term(s): Services effectiveness; United Kingdom (UK); US/foreign comparisons
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=128666

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.