skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 134247 Find in a Library
Title: Marital Rape: A Crime? A Comparative Law Study of the Laws of the United States and the State of Israel
Journal: International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice  Volume:15  Issue:1 and 2  Dated:(Spring/Fall 1991)  Pages:207-216
Author(s): J J Gross
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 10
Type: Survey (Cross-Cultural)
Format: Article
Language: English
Country: United States of America
Annotation: A comparison is made, on several levels, of the laws of various States in the United States and the State of Israel concerning the crime of rape as personally committed by a husband upon his wife, known as "marital rape."
Abstract: Among the 50 States, there is a sharp division whether such an act is criminal at all. The majority of States have held the act not criminal based primarily upon the common law doctrine of marital immunity first enunciated in England by Lord Hale. Some of these States have followed the Model Penal Code and codified the immunity concept within their criminal law. Those States which have rejected Hale's immunity concept include New York, New Jersey, Alabama, and others. Upon judicial review, New York invalidated its statutory immunity for husbands by declaring it unconstitutional and a violation of the fourteenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution. New Jersey, as an example, statutorily eliminated the defense of marital immunity for rape, while other States simply rejected Hale's doctrine altogether. In 1980, Israel judicially rejected the defense of marital immunity insofar as a Jewish married couple was concerned by selectively utilizing Jewish religious law. It later enacted legislation eliminating the defense of marital immunity for rape for all persons regardless of religion. (Author abstract)
Main Term(s): Spousal Rape
Index Term(s): Cultural influences; Foreign laws; Israel; US/foreign comparisons
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=134247

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.