skip navigation

PUBLICATIONS

Register for Latest Research

Stay Informed
Register with NCJRS to receive NCJRS's biweekly e-newsletter JUSTINFO and additional periodic emails from NCJRS and the NCJRS federal sponsors that highlight the latest research published or sponsored by the Office of Justice Programs.

NCJRS Abstract

The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Virtual Library collection. To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the Virtual Library. See the Obtain Documents page for direction on how to access resources online, via mail, through interlibrary loans, or in a local library.

 

NCJ Number: 134512 Find in a Library
Title: Comparison of Judicial Roles Under the JDA and YOA (From Young Offenders Act: A Revolution in Canadian Criminal Justice, P 128-145, 1991, Alan W Leschied, Peter G Jaffe, et al, eds. -- See NCJ-134506)
Author(s): L A Beaulieu
Date Published: 1991
Page Count: 18
Sponsoring Agency: University of Toronto Press
Toronto, Ontario M4Y 2W8, Canada
Sale Source: University of Toronto Press
Marketing Manager
10 St. Mary Street
Suite 700
Toronto, Ontario M4Y 2W8,
Canada
Type: Legislation/Policy Analysis
Language: English
Country: Canada
Annotation: The Young Offenders Act has changed the role of the juvenile court judge from that specified by the previous Juvenile Delinquents Act by stating the new belief that juvenile court judges must respond to the needs of due process and must emphasize the accountability and responsibility of juvenile offenders for their actions.
Abstract: The new law also continues the previous emphasis on acknowledging the special needs of youth. Some judges have suggested that these goals may be incompatible. Nevertheless, judges must address not only the needs and civil rights of the youth but also the concerns for the protection of the community. Balancing the different interests presents a major challenge to juvenile court judges. Nevertheless, the law's express limitations on judicial discretion need not prevent juvenile court judges from using the sensitivity and other human values long associated with them. 23 reference notes
Main Term(s): Juvenile codes; Juvenile judges
Index Term(s): Canada; Foreign juvenile justice systems; Judicial discretion; Juvenile justice reform
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=134512

*A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's website is provided. Tell us how you use the NCJRS Library and Abstracts Database - send us your feedback.